School breakfast participation rises while lunch program participation declines

-
Recent data from the United States Department of Agriculture shows that more children are participating in school breakfast. The article below states that the number of children consuming breakfast offered in schools has grown from 12.81 million in 2011-2012 to 13.15 million in 2012-2013.  Allowing children to take breakfast outside of the cafeteria setting, such as with “grab-and-go” meals, have assisted in improving participation rates. According to Janey Thorton, USDA deputy under secretary, there have been more schools offering children breakfast at no charge. This is positive news to see that schools are finding innovative ways to ensure that children are not sitting hungry in their classrooms until lunch time. For parents who have children on the school bus for up to an hour in the morning, waking them early enough for breakfast may not be a top priority. Grab-and-go options or even free breakfasts at schools are convenient for parents, and they can rest assured that their children will not be left with an empty stomach.

On the contrary, the article also states that the USDA recently found that fewer children are purchasing school lunches since the updating of nutrition standards to include healthier options. Participation in 2012-2013 decreased 3% from the previous school year. Some nutrition professionals believe children may not prefer the healthier options while other professionals say that schools in general are choosing not to participate in the lunch program anymore. Either way, the hope is that students who are no longer purchasing school lunches are bringing their own packed lunches instead so they are not hungry throughout the rest of the school day.

-SH

Hellmich, Nanci. "More Kids Skip School Lunch, but Breakfasts Are up." USA Today. 20 Aug. 2013. Web. 11 Oct. 2013.


http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/08/20/school-breakfast-up-lunch-down/2673275/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Are All Sugars Created Equal?

-
Image
Are All Sugars Created Equal?  I think one of the most confusing nutrition topics for people is sugar. With so many conflicting stories out there, it’s difficult to separate the facts from the fiction. Not to mention, the types of sugars are endless. How do we know what’s best for our bodies? White or brown sugar? Cane or raw? Should we just go with Stevia instead? Is it even okay to consume artificial sweeteners? Should we avoid foods with high amounts of natural sugar in them? Each answer only seems to lead to another question!  Let’s start off with distinguishing the purpose of sugar in the first place. Do our bodies even need it? The short answer is yes! Sugars are carbohydrates (what we commonly call “carbs”), one of the three main macronutrients that our bodies need for fuel to function and survive. One of the major ways to categorize sugar is by separating the “natural” sugars from the “added” sugars. Natural sugars are, well, naturally found in foods. They give us the energy th
Read more

Milk Mythbusters

-
Image
Just like with any nutrition topic, the facts about milk can become convoluted pretty quickly. Whether you drink milk for the protein, the nutrients, the flavor, or just like to switch it up, there are pros and cons to every kind. Here are some quick nutritional facts about each type to help you decide which is best for you. Animal-Based Milks  Whole Milk: The original diary drink. It gets a bad rap, but what whole milk has going for it, is that it’s in its proper nutritional form. Whole milk contains all of its original fat-soluble vitamins, A, E, D, & K, along with the fat to help you absorb them all. It also has the proper concentrations and ratio of polyunsaturated fatty acids, or your omega-3s and omega-6s, so that they are metabolized as they should be. The downside is that whole milk is calorically dense, meaning that a little goes a long way. You don’t need much to get what you need, so just don’t overdo it!  2% Milk: The fat content of 2% milk is about half of that in who
Read more