Depression and Dietary Intake in HIV Patients

-

Previous studies have demonstrated that depression can have a number of negative effects on dietary intake, ranging from skipping meals, lacking motivation to eat, selecting poor food choices, and others.  It has also been shown that depression is a common problem in HIV patients, with prevalence estimates of up to 37% of HIV patients affected.  With this in mind, researchers from Australia sought to determine how depression affects dietary intake in patients suffering from HIV, and their findings were published in the International Journal of STD & AIDS.  The study sample was composed of 58 HIV patients and was split into a depressed group (n=21) and a non-depressed group (n=37).  Dietary intake was evaluated through a diet history, food frequency questionnaire, and 24-hour recall conducted by a dietitian, and depression level was measured using a depression scale.  As far as macronutrient intake is concerned, the depressed patients consumed a significantly lower amount of fiber than the non-depressed patients, but there weren’t any other significant differences for any of the other macronutrients between the two groups.  In addition, vitamin A, magnesium, and folate intakes were significantly less in patients who were depressed than in those who were not.  Overall, the researchers concluded that there are significant differences in the diet quality of depressed HIV patients with that of non-depressed HIV patients and that this is a topic meriting further study.  Poor nutritional status can impair the immune system, which is already weakened due to the HIV disease state, further increasing the likelihood of disease-associated morbidity and mortality.  For this reason, understanding the impact that depression has on the dietary intake of HIV patients can help nutrition and medical professionals to better treat this unique subset of patients.    

Ashley    

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Are All Sugars Created Equal?

-
Image
Are All Sugars Created Equal?  I think one of the most confusing nutrition topics for people is sugar. With so many conflicting stories out there, it’s difficult to separate the facts from the fiction. Not to mention, the types of sugars are endless. How do we know what’s best for our bodies? White or brown sugar? Cane or raw? Should we just go with Stevia instead? Is it even okay to consume artificial sweeteners? Should we avoid foods with high amounts of natural sugar in them? Each answer only seems to lead to another question!  Let’s start off with distinguishing the purpose of sugar in the first place. Do our bodies even need it? The short answer is yes! Sugars are carbohydrates (what we commonly call “carbs”), one of the three main macronutrients that our bodies need for fuel to function and survive. One of the major ways to categorize sugar is by separating the “natural” sugars from the “added” sugars. Natural sugars are, well, naturally found in foods. They give us the energy th
Read more

Milk Mythbusters

-
Image
Just like with any nutrition topic, the facts about milk can become convoluted pretty quickly. Whether you drink milk for the protein, the nutrients, the flavor, or just like to switch it up, there are pros and cons to every kind. Here are some quick nutritional facts about each type to help you decide which is best for you. Animal-Based Milks  Whole Milk: The original diary drink. It gets a bad rap, but what whole milk has going for it, is that it’s in its proper nutritional form. Whole milk contains all of its original fat-soluble vitamins, A, E, D, & K, along with the fat to help you absorb them all. It also has the proper concentrations and ratio of polyunsaturated fatty acids, or your omega-3s and omega-6s, so that they are metabolized as they should be. The downside is that whole milk is calorically dense, meaning that a little goes a long way. You don’t need much to get what you need, so just don’t overdo it!  2% Milk: The fat content of 2% milk is about half of that in who
Read more