Farm to School Meals

-

Richmond, E. (2015).  More students are eating locally sourced food. The Atlantic. Retrieved from http://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2015/10/farm-to-school-gains-momentum/411562/

Emily Richmond’s article, “More students are eating locally source foods,” she explains the rising interest in bringing locally sourced food and the positives and negatives associated.   In fact, the article states that there has been a 55% increase of locally food eaten in the 2013-2014 school year than in the 2011-2012 year.  The School Nutrition Association does not like these new changes. They claim that fewer students are buying the lunches and that the kids do not like the new foods, creating a problem with foods being thrown out.  These claims are inconsistent with census respondents, whom have stated the benefits of the initiative being one or more of the following- “Less plate waste; improved acceptance of the healthier school meals; increased participation in school meals programs; lower school meal program costs; and increased support from parents and community members for the healthier school meals” (Richmond 2015).
There seem to be many benefits of the farm to school programs.  The School Nutrition Association seems to be against the initiative, most likely related to the time and resource commitments.  The vast health benefit, even just nutrition awareness, is worth the cost for schools.  Many times children are resistant to change, but just because students may not be used to the new program, does not mean the school should immediately throw in the towel.  It is evident that the program is just taking off by the increase of participation over the years and the reports of other schools planning on incorporating this program.
-Danielle Gabrish

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Are All Sugars Created Equal?

-
Image
Are All Sugars Created Equal?  I think one of the most confusing nutrition topics for people is sugar. With so many conflicting stories out there, it’s difficult to separate the facts from the fiction. Not to mention, the types of sugars are endless. How do we know what’s best for our bodies? White or brown sugar? Cane or raw? Should we just go with Stevia instead? Is it even okay to consume artificial sweeteners? Should we avoid foods with high amounts of natural sugar in them? Each answer only seems to lead to another question!  Let’s start off with distinguishing the purpose of sugar in the first place. Do our bodies even need it? The short answer is yes! Sugars are carbohydrates (what we commonly call “carbs”), one of the three main macronutrients that our bodies need for fuel to function and survive. One of the major ways to categorize sugar is by separating the “natural” sugars from the “added” sugars. Natural sugars are, well, naturally found in foods. They give us the energy th
Read more

Milk Mythbusters

-
Image
Just like with any nutrition topic, the facts about milk can become convoluted pretty quickly. Whether you drink milk for the protein, the nutrients, the flavor, or just like to switch it up, there are pros and cons to every kind. Here are some quick nutritional facts about each type to help you decide which is best for you. Animal-Based Milks  Whole Milk: The original diary drink. It gets a bad rap, but what whole milk has going for it, is that it’s in its proper nutritional form. Whole milk contains all of its original fat-soluble vitamins, A, E, D, & K, along with the fat to help you absorb them all. It also has the proper concentrations and ratio of polyunsaturated fatty acids, or your omega-3s and omega-6s, so that they are metabolized as they should be. The downside is that whole milk is calorically dense, meaning that a little goes a long way. You don’t need much to get what you need, so just don’t overdo it!  2% Milk: The fat content of 2% milk is about half of that in who
Read more