Comparison of a novel, simple nutrition screening tool for adult oncology inpatients and the Malnutrition Screening Tool(MST) against the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment(PG-SGA).
Shaw C, Fleuret C, Pickard J, Mohammed K, Black G, Wedlake,
L. Comparison of a novel, simple nutrition screening tool for adult oncology
inpatients and the Malnutrition Screening Tool(MST) against the
Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment(PG-SGA). Support Care
CancerI.2015;23(1):47-54.
This
article evaluates the specificity and sensitivity of different methods of
assessing nutrition status. What is different is that this article is looking
to find a the best one for a specific disease.
While some
screening tools are better than others overall for identifying malnutrition in
patients, no one tool is the best for everyone. More than the contents of this
study the idea itself is what is important. Instead of a tool or method
that is used throughout dietetics or through a hospital using one
that has been proven to me the most effective at identifying malnutrition
within a specific disease state is the most appropriate course of action.
Malnutrition can have a number of different manifestations, each disease state can cause signs and symptoms that are different from each other, but all indicate malnutrition of some time. This is why a master tool can not be as effective as custom tools.
Some
outside of medical professions may not see the importance of what tool to use
or what method should be standard. Statistics show that 1/3 of those who are
malnourished upon admission go unidentified. Two-thirds of that population
becomes even more malnourished while in the hospital.
Malnourishment
can exacerbate current disease symptoms, hinder the healing process, reduce
quality of life, increase stays in hospital, and increase mortality.
Ellsworth
Comments
Post a Comment