Barriers to Shopping at the Farmers' Market
A study was performed on urban, WIC-enrolled women to see
what their perceived influences were to shopping at local farmers markets. In
1992, the WIC Farmers’ Market Nutrition Programs (FMNP) was created to provide
local fruits and vegetables to WIC enrolled women, as well as raise awareness
of local famers’ markets. Unfortunately, the redemption rate of these FMNP
vouchers are not optimal (63%) so research has been conducted to see the
barriers to shopping at farmers markets.
In the study being reviewed, the first barrier to shopping
at farmers market were transportation issues. With many individuals not having
a car, it can be a problem getting to the farmers’ market, especially if it is
far away. Because there is a higher rate of supermarkets versus farmers’
markets, it is more likely that these individuals were closer and more conveniently
located to a supermarket. Another barrier was that many of the women did not
know where the farmers’ markets were at, especially if the markets move to a
new venue weekly/monthly. Other barriers dealing directly with the farmers’
markets were limited hours that they were open and the quality of the fruits
and vegetables at the markets. Many of the individuals were used to the clean,
well displayed food at the supermarket, so the looks of possibly dirty, bruised
items at the farmers’ market could definitely be a barrier to some individuals
who might not think it is sanitary or safe.
Although this study was conducted on WIC-enrolled women,
many points can be reflective of general populations. Location and hours of
farmers’ markets could definitely be a set-back to many individuals considering
work schedules. Better advertisement of farmers’ markets in communities could
help individuals be more aware of when and where their local markets are.
KH
Di Noia, J., Monica, D., Cullen, K. W., & Thompson, D.
(2017). Perceived Influences on Farmers’ Market Use among Urban, WIC-enrolled
Women. American Journal Of Health Behavior, 41(5), 618-629. doi:10.5993/AJHB.41.5.11
Comments
Post a Comment